New Earth

newearthDon’t you just love a fresh start?  And this feels very fresh.  Although it is Russell T Davies second year as showrunner, it is his first story set on an alien planet, having previously grounded the series on Earth, with a couple of trips to a space station.  This didn’t go uncommented upon, and here is his response, with the Mill’s first attempt to depict an alien planet, somehow managing to convincingly augment the Gower Peninsula in Wales to make it look like a future landscape, complete with stereotypical flying cars, because you’ve got to have those in the future.

New Earth ends one story, continues another, and starts a couple of running themes.  This is David Tennant’s first chance to be the Doctor throughout an episode, having slept through most of his debut episode and only showed up to be the hero at the end.  Although it all feels very new it is grounded in the past as well, with Cassandra and the Face of Boe returning to reassure us that this is all part of the same ongoing series.  Cassandra’s story is wrapped up in a way that makes her more than just a one-dimensional villain, and not just because she bodysnatches her way from two dimensions to three.  She is a sinner who repents when she experiences the suffering of others and is redeemed, a much more interesting type of antagonist for the Doctor than the simple pantomime villains he often faces.  I have used deliberately biblical terminology there, because this brings us to one the themes of the episode: the Doctor as a messianic figure.

The Face of Boe’s story continues with him using a new-found ability to speak (from our perspective) to get all prophesying and mystical, referring to the Doctor as a “lonely god”.  This is the start of a long exploration of the level of power the Doctor has, and the following sounds pretty godlike:

I’m the Doctor. If you don’t like it, if you want to take it to a higher authority, there isn’t one. It stops with me!

Looked at in these terms the Doctor’s solution to the problem comes into focus.  This is Doctor Who rejecting the constraints of what is scientifically possible and working within the realms of the purely symbolic, with all science and logic having to stretch to fit the needs of the fiction.  This was the approach script editor Christopher H Bidmead found himself stuck with in the early 80s, when attempts to ground Doctor Who in the rational proved impossible.  No writer has ever been able to squeeze Doctor Who into that straight jacket, and you won’t do it as a viewer.  Check all notions of immersive viewing at the door when you become a Doctor Who fan, or be forever frustrated.

We know that however advanced the medicine of the future becomes, mixing up intravenous solutions and showering patients with them all isn’t going to work.  It is a shame that the word “intravenous” is in there, because it is the one thing that stops Clarke’s Third Law from applying.  But this is the “lonely god” in a hospital staffed by nuns who have strayed from the path, performing a miracle baptism and then asking the cured to lay on hands to heal all the rest.  All signs of the illness disappear within seconds, leaving not a trace of scars.  This ain’t science.

We are at the beginning of a curve which will be built up and up, and then subverted.  The Doctor is an obvious candidate for this kind of parallel, what with rising from the dead every few years, and solving a lot of his problems with an overtly magical form of pseudoscience, and Doctor Who has finally matured to a point where it can start to tackle this head on.

No less interesting is another curve we are at the start of: the rights of clones to be treated as people.  We will follow this curve through The Doctor’s Daughter and Journey’s End, and then Steven Moffat will pick it up and run with it in The Rebel Flesh and The Zygon Invasion.  I suspect we have not yet reached the end of that particular theme.

A few  closing thoughts:

  • The Doctor receives a message on his psychic paper. It is never made clear who sent the message, but presumably it was the Face of Boe, who is telepathic.
  • Cassandra asks Chip about how Rose speaks, but she knows Rose better than he does anyway.
  • ‘I shall proceed up the apples and pairs.’ Surely the Doctor should notice the difference in Rose instantly? He’s meant to be kind of clever, remember.
  • The Doctor wields the sonic screwdriver like a weapon to threaten Cassandra. He might just as well be carrying a gun.
  • I suspect one particular line in this story will make it seem horribly dated eventually: Cassandra realising she is a “chav”.  The word was very fresh at the time and being bandied about everywhere, but it was not long before people started to realise what the word was actually doing within society.  In 2011 Chavs: the Demonization of the Working Class by Owen Jones was published, received a lot of press attention, and started to make people think.  If nothing else this word will date the story, but when enough time has passed will future releases of this episode have the line edited out?  I wouldn’t rule it out.   RP

The view from across the pond:

It’s been years since my first viewing of New Earth.

Back in the 90’s, I viewed a show called Babylon 5.  90 of the 110 episodes were written by one man.  It made me realize with crystal clarity that the writing was everything.  It could mean the difference between cult classic and epic failure!  Epic failure for Doctor Who could lead us back into the wilderness where there is no new Who to be found anywhere.  So it’s important that we get the writing right.  Special effects are a perk; they are nice, but not a necessity.  New Who has the effects down pretty well, but writing can be hit or miss.  We get some epic wins and some epic flops.  In either case, the actors have to convey what’s written but if the story isn’t there, even the best actors can’t make the masterpiece they might want.

Russell T. Davies had written New Earth and I can’t help but question what he was thinking!  In retrospect, we can look at RTDs body of work on Doctor Who and realize he did emotion extremely well.  But there could be too many plot holes or silliness that took too much of a toll on the episode.   Doctor Who should be fun, without being dopey and sometimes, like farting aliens and burping garbage cans, we get the latter at the expense of the former.

 Let’s look at the issues!

  • The Doctor receives a call via his psychic paper but stops for a picnic first.  It doesn’t seem sensible.  It was done more for the visuals than the internal logic of the episode.
  • Cassandra’s spiders wandering the fields that happen to be the same where the Doctor landed.
  • The episode throws a cable driven elevator our way as well as a reel-to-reel video player.  (My gut says five billion years from now, we won’t be needing those technologies.)
  • Cassandra died at the conclusion of “The End of the World”.  Even if one could save her, who would do it?  Her body exploded and the 2 “moisturizers” on the station, even if they are allowed to leave, would not have collected her … bits.   Yet someone brought her back to life.  Why?  As a writer, there needs to be internal logic for the show.
  • Who created Chip, a creature that was created like Frankenstein’s monster?  Remember, Cassandra has no hands!  And why do they (Chip and cass) live in what appears to be a disused area in a hospital.
  • Chip also knows about cell phones and dialects.  Shouldn’t Cassandra know that and Frankenstein’s cousin be the one asking about it?
  • The psychograft needs to capture Rose to be able to move Cassandra between bodies.  But only the first time.  Then she can be blown like a kiss from person to person.  How does that make any sense?  (Yes, it makes for some funny scenes, but the humor needs to work with the story, not independent of it.)
  • And when the Doctor hides inside one of the containment pods, wouldn’t that be so riddled with contagious material that even his biology might suffer?
  • Lastly, Father’s Day depicted how dangerous it was going back and changing the past yet the Doctor has no problem going back in time with Cassandra?  She was the villain; he hardly did it for a friend!   How does he know she won’t try to take over her old body? How does he know this isn’t what caused her to spiral out of control to begin with?

Now, the episode isn’t without some redemption. There are some great visuals like the shadows of cars flying cast on the Doctor and Rose!  There is some truly great music and some marvelous lines.  I love a bit of foreshadowing too: “He will only talk to a wanderer, the man without a home, the lonely god”.  Another of RTD’s long games!

If there was one line that really nailed both the character and the show in general it was “Life wins out”.  It’s a reminder of the Doctor’s old adage: “While there’s life, there’s hope.” Even in the face of Death the Doctor has always found the good.  In Genesis of the Daleks Baker says “out of all their evil must come something good”. It is reflected when The Doctor takes Cassandra back to find her own redemption (albeit in another body).

Remember the old adage: what doesn’t add to the story, takes away from it.  There was too much here that did not add to the story.  It doesn’t have to be new all the time, but if it retreads old ground, the writing has to be near perfect and this story was not!  Nor was it all that new.  In fact, there was very little new about New Earth.   ML

Read next in the Junkyard… Tooth and Claw

About Roger Pocock

Co-writer on Author of Editor of
This entry was posted in Doctor Who, Entertainment, Reviews, Science Fiction, Television, Tenth Doctor and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to New Earth

  1. Karandi says:

    I have to agree. While it was a nice setting change, the story just didn’t pull its weight and ultimately this is fairly forgettable.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mike Loschiavo says:

      Well said, Karandi! Forgettable. That’s actually worse than bad. At least “bad” gets us talking. I think New Earth will be largely forgotten.


      Liked by 2 people

  2. Hello! Glad I found this blog. This is the first episode of Dr. Who that I watched, and right now, I am on the Angels’ episode in the next season.
    This post made me realise how much the show has progressed in just one season. The plot has become less superficial and a bit complex, and some things still seem unreasonable, but that’s what the experience of watching the series is all about.
    I won’t understand everything you write here (I being fairly new Whovian), but the post that I do understand, I’ll read and enjoy.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Welcome to the blog! I am always envious of somebody discovering Doctor Who for the first time – there’s so much to enjoy! We’ll be covering all the rest of the episodes over the course of this year, including all the David Tennant ones 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mike says:

      Welcome to the Junkyard! Feel free to jump in, get involved and share your thoughts with us. Like Roger, I envy you. I got hooked decades back and still love the show. It doesn’t always get it right and those are fun to pick on, but when it does, it can frequently blow your mind. Ironically, I think this was one of Tennant’s weakest stories, so the fact that it was your first… it’ll just get better from here!

      I look forward to reading more from you. You’re a welcome addition!

      Might I ask, which side of the pond you’re on?


      Liked by 1 person

      • If I look at that episode now, I’ll still like it despite all its faults because it was the one to get me hooked to the show(I must have been desperate back then). Actually, I had watched the episode of the ninth doctor in which Cassandra makes an appearance and the sun’s near to exploding but I never thought of going back to it again( and arguably it was a better episode than the one with 10 in it). Probably it was David Tennant who got me interested. And the show has been getting better and better ever since.
        If you don’t mind the long-winded nature of my conversation, I’d like to tell you so much. There aren’t many people who like this show much, calling it overrated and repetitive. But there is so much to see, learn and enjoy!
        Some episodes are especially nice. Like the one featuring Shakespeare. Or Blink. And Human nature. I loved the way it played out. I truly felt sorry for his reluctance to become the doctor once again, his vulnerability and his I-don’t-want-to-but-am-compelled-to-save-this-damned-world-ish helplessness. Standing at this juncture, I can look back at the show and feel a sort of maternal pride. Silly, I know, yet a fact I don’t mind admitting.

        After this, you’d rather you hadn’t asked me to tell you more about my opinions😅

        Oh, I am from India. And I’m not sure which side of the pond that is.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mike says:

        On the contrary! I love that you feel that way and wrote so much. Please, write more!

        I got hooked when I was 8, in the US. I’m …older now and still feel that way. I think your description of maternal pride is perfect bc when I got hooked in 1980, people around me just were not watching so to see it come back now as strong as it is, being able to buy books wherever you go or watch it on demand…. it’s a gift. And it does feel like paternal pride indeed.
        You’re also right about the things that are wrong with it still standing out as great especially on those early episodes that got you hooked. And for human nature, did you know there was a book version long before there was an episode? True story!

        I am definitely looking forward to reading more from you. This will be a fun adventure having you with us.


        Liked by 2 people

      • It’s great to have found someone who loves the show. Everyone around me is indifferent to it, and those who do found it interesting have exhausted their excitement long ago.
        P. S That book is on my TBR list now.

        Liked by 2 people

      • I think I can safely say nobody involved with this blog will be exhausting our excitement about Doctor Who any time soon 😀

        Liked by 1 person

      • That’s good to know!

        Liked by 1 person

      • We’ve covered Blink, but the others you mention we have yet to cover on the blog. The next one on the horizon (out of those you have mentioned) will be The Shakespeare Code on 5th March. Human Nature will be on 6th April and also an article on Symbolism in Human Nature the following day. I send out a daily email with a link to the latest article and a list of what’s coming soon, so let me know if you want to be added in to that (ditto anyone else reading this comments section). Don’t put your email address in the comments section though, for obvious reasons! Good choices of favourite episodes, by the way. Blink and Human Nature in particular are amazing. RP

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ever since I joined WordPress, my inbox has been too full of emails from the blogs I follow. So I have stopped going through them. Even if you do send me a notification, it will get lost in the milieu of mails that make their way into my inbox.
        But worry not, I’ll be closely following your blog.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Fair enough! Thanks for following 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Karandi Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s