The Twilight Zone: The Wunderkind

the wunderkindWell, I stand corrected: the social commentary can work. The Twilight Zone has decided to run with that approach now in two episodes and this one was only slightly less in-you-face than Replay yet I appreciated the message.  I can also accept it with the former episode, too.  In some ways, the former was making a social commentary, while this one goes political.  If I’m honest, both work, though I was reluctant to accept it initially.  In this case, it takes the classic It’s a Good Life, where a young boy has otherworldly powers, and makes it a bit more real.  By putting the child in the role of President of the United States, he basically has that power.  His wishes become reality.  He can base all of his decisions on a whim and no one will contradict him because he has ultimate power.

Now, that’s not to say its actually believable.  I’d go so far as to say it’s intrinsically flawed from the start.  To run for President, the incumbent cannot be younger than 35 so making a 10-year-old the President is impossible.  But even if, through some fluke, such a thing happened, people do not follow blindly.  Well… actually… ha!  Allow me a chance to rephrase that: a decorated war general is not going to blindly follow the whim of a 10 year old kid.  It implies a level of stupidity that is so off-the-charts, that America would have been destroyed by invaders walking in backwards and saying they were leaving.  (I hope I don’t give any would-be invaders any ideas!)  

Now, once again, ignoring logic, the episode is disquieting.  IF such a thing happened, the general public would be swallowed like Earth when Galactus shows up.  We’d be victims of whatever the petulant child in power decides.  This is a frightening notion… until you turn on CNN and realize we’re already there.  But that brings up a bigger item within the fiction of the series: the news.  I noticed it early on, but did not take enough time to recall where it was.  The fact is, I saw “Whipple” on one of the first episodes and it tickled my memory because I vaguely recalled a title from Classic Zone, The Brain Center at Whipples.  I don’t recall the episode beyond the title, but now Whipple is the news center and (small spoiler, as I’m a week ahead), next week it will feature even more prominently.  So what is going on?  Is this Twilight Zone taking place in a universe that connects each story?  (It will be more cohesive than Doctor Who, at any rate!)

John Cho (Sulu from the rebooted Star Trek movies) plays Raff Hanks, the titular Wunderkind who helps Oliver Foley (Jacob Tremblay) come to power.  I like Cho in most things he’s in, but had a hard time warming to him in this.  Part of that is watching him drink to oblivion because he failed the current president, only to realize he has an idea, and runs out of the bar (presumably sober enough to drive) because the idea kicked out any of the effects of the alcohol.  Hell of an idea, huh?  Tremblay is great as the petulant child President but utterly loathsome as a person; which is how we should feel about him.  He doesn’t get it, and cries when he doesn’t get his way.  One area that hurt the episode for me was John Larroquette, playing the outgoing President. His portrayal was the first time I felt The Twilight Zone was run by the same ignoramuses at CBS as Star Trek: Discovery.  See, CBS All Access clearly thinks that “hey, we’re R rated, so we can do things network TV can’t” translates into “let’s throw out as many F bombs as a season of The Sopranos simply because we can!”  Larroquette unleashes a string of expletives that would make Tony Soprano blush and, yeah, he’s angry, but he should have been the contrast to the new President, not painted as foolishly as his successor.  Let the viewing audience really see how bad things get!  But as the President in Star Trek VI says, “just because we can do a thing, does not mean we should do a thing!”  Apt, considering the source.  Just because you can unleash a string of expletives, does not mean it does anything for the episode.   Well, short of bring it down.

Frankly, no one in this episode was likable and when Cho sees the full extent of the horror of his Frankenstein-ian creation, it’s with a sense of relief for the audience that we have purged the gene pool of such a blind fool as Raff Hanks.  Yes, the allegory was fun and I did get a kick out of it, realizing that this is doing the same thing as classic Trek: showing us the mistakes of our past and present through allegory but I still am not sure I need ideas bashed over my head with such blunt force.   At least I can say Jordan Peele is still knocking it out of the park as the Narrator.  Well, I’m ready to go deeper into the Zone…  ML

This entry was posted in Doctor Who, Entertainment, Random Chatter, Science Fiction, Television. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Twilight Zone: The Wunderkind

  1. scifimike70 says:

    Troubling episodes of most newer SF incarnations may make me reflect even more positively on favoured episodes (and sometimes even on not-so-favoured episodes) of the original classics. I say this now because the last two recent new-TZ episodes have urged me to reminisce with one from the classic TZ. And quite agreeably, it was Dust, which had a powerful message on human values (with a supernatural ingredient which reminds us that Rod Serling wrote Dust himself).

    Some might resent the new TZ for seeming too politically correct as I’ve read, which were similar complaints made about Dr. Who: S11. We appreciate SF for its courageous non-comformity, yet with inherently moral messages, which made The Twilight Zone, Star Trek and Dr. Who the Holy Trinity for SF television in the 1960s. But reigniting that magic is often a gamble at best. So this much motivates me to still give the new TZ the chance it clearly deserves.

    Thank you, ML. 🌎🌏🌍🌌🖖🏻

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Roger Pocock says:

    The advisor says that one of the parents’ names will be on the official paperwork, so that circumvents the age rule. People would actually be voting for the parent as president, with the arrogant brat telling him or her what to do I suppose. That said, we had to give up on this episode after about 10 minutes as neither of us could stomach it for any longer. The whole thing seemed utterly ridiculous and annoying beyond belief.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s