Pliny’s UFO

meteorPliny the Elder’s Naturalis Historia is a fascinating piece of work, displaying an understanding of the world that seems remarkably ahead of its time. The first book concerns what we could broadly term astronomy. I recommend reading the whole text, but I am going to focus here on chapter 35, which has been picked up by UFOlogists as possible evidence for a sighting in 76BC:

“We have an account of a spark falling from a star, and increasing as it approached the earth, until it became of the size of the moon, shining as through a cloud; it afterwards returned into the heavens and was converted into a lampas; this occurred in the consulship of Cn. Octavius and C. Scribonius. It was seen by Silanus, the proconsul, and his attendants.”

A “lampas”, or “lampades” in the plural, has no exact translation as we can’t be quite sure what was intended, but it was almost certainly a variety of meteor. If we look back to chapter 25, we have the terms “faces”, “lampades”, “bolides” and “trabes” all used to describe moving objects of light in the sky, literally, “torches”, “lamps”, “darts” and “beams”. The differences in appearance between those four can only be a matter for conjecture.

Earlier in the book we have all kinds of celestial phenomena described, and most of them are clearly indicating natural events that we can understand: eclipses, meteors, the aurora borealis, etc. But this one’s a bit different. How do we explain a falling star that gets to a certain point and then goes back up into the sky?

So firstly it’s fair to acknowledge that the Romans reporting the phenomenon are a proconsul and two consuls, so these are important people and we actually have names of who saw the “lampas”, which is a step up from often vague reports of this kind of thing in history. Also, Pliny moved in the highest circles of Roman society, so it is quite possible that this account came direct to him from the horse’s mouth, rather than the usual game of Chinese Whispers where accounts can get hugely exaggerated, although it is important to realise that a secondary source with even just one link in the chain is open to a distortion of the facts. People like to impress their friends with anecdotes, and the temptation to tweak things a little bit to sound more exciting is huge.

There has been much speculation over the years of what Silanus and his consuls might have seen, with suggestions of a comet, a nova or ball lightning not quite fitting the description. RB Stothers, writing in 1987, suggested a meteoric fireball, with the “return to the heavens” and conversion to a “lampas” the point at which it exploded in the atmosphere. A “spark falling from a star” does sound like a piece breaking off of a larger object that is burning up in the atmosphere, so I don’t think we can chalk this up as a Borg sphere leaving its cube with any degree of confidence!

This one is open to interpretation, but I always think that the rational approach is to reach for the UFO explanation as the last possibility on the list when nothing else makes sense, rather than the first conclusion we leap to.   RP

About Roger Pocock

Co-writer on Author of Editor of
This entry was posted in Entertainment, History and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Pliny’s UFO

  1. scifimike70 says:

    The last thing you said makes perfect sense. It is open to interpretation, yet the most extraordinary explanation makes the best sense after all the ordinary explanations fail. Discernment is important. But it’s likely enough, for the immense age of our universe, that there are many ET races ahead of us, and phenomenally so as realized in 2001: A Space Odyssey, and that visitations to our ancient Earth could also be likely. Star Wars gave us a good look of what advanced intergalactic life could have been like long before life as we know it on Earth. So for the sake of science-fiction having its realistic roots in science-plausibility-and-eventuality, we all have another nice reason thanks to this subject to visit the Junkyard. Thank you, RP. 🖖🏻

    Liked by 1 person

    • scifimike70 says:

      In fact, this is also a good reason to now include Star Trek reviews on the Junkyard. So thank you again for that too. 🖖🏻

      Liked by 1 person

      • scifimike70 says:

        I can also imagine that Dr. Who reviews for classics like The Daemons and Pyramids Of Mars will get even more attention on the Junkyard thanks to your ancient-UFO articles. 🖖🏻

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s