Spaceships at the Crucifixion

Once again I am indebted to a good friend for bringing another interesting painting to my attention, one that has fascinated UFO enthusiasts who went looking for historical evidence.  So here we have a 1350 fresco from the Visoki Decani Monestary in Kosovo, Serbia, artist unknown, with two details highlighted below:

Visoki Decani Monestary in Kosovo, Serbia Crucifixion

“Aha!” say UFO fans: spaceships at the Crucifixion.  Let’s start by getting something out of the way that I discussed fully in a previous article: this was painted 13 centuries after the event, so it cannot be taken as evidence of what happened on that day without us being completely irrational.  So let’s dismiss it as evidence of UFOs actually being at the Crucifixion immediately, because that would be a foolish line of reasoning.

What remains is to look at the intentions of the artist.  Was he trying to portray spaceships in his painting?  Might the artist have seen UFOs being piloted in this way, and incorporated that into his art?

The first problem with that idea is that they aren’t the same as each other.  If these are space shuttles, why wouldn’t they look the same?  Why would one of the pilots be facing the back of his ship, and flying it backward?  Is he showing off?  So we’ve got a problem there straight away.

Now look closely at the “ship” on the right.  Does something look familiar, in that shape?  Yes, it’s a crescent moon.  What we have here is in fact a representation of the sun and the moon.  Have a look at the following quote, from the Gospel of Luke:

It was now about noon, and darkness came over the whole land  until three in the afternoon, while the sun’s light failed; and the curtain of the temple was torn in two.

So the artist here is representing that aspect of the Crucifixion by showing the sun and the moon both present in the sky at the same time.  Why do they have people inside them?  Well, you’ve heard of the man in the moon?  That’s very much a Renaissance art thing.  Here’s one from 1463 that shows the moon with a face:


And here’s a German woodcut from 1493 showing the sun and the moon with faces.  If you do a search online you will find endless similar examples:


Now the interesting thing about the Crucifixion example is that it shows whole humans (not alien blobs or Cybermen, note) inside the sun and the moon, and I haven’t found any other example of that in Renaissance art.  Use the comments section if you know of any.  But either way, I don’t think we can reasonably take much from that other than an artist trying to do something a bit different and avoid producing an entirely derivative piece of art.  Then again, looking at other areas of the painting, such as Jesus’ feet standing comfortably on a platform, might just lead us to another conclusion.  Whoever this anonymous painter was, maybe he just wasn’t a very good artist.   RP

Further reading: The UFO Baptism

About Roger Pocock

Co-writer on Author of Editor of
This entry was posted in Art, History and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Spaceships at the Crucifixion

  1. scifimike70 says:

    I remember a picture book with some historical artwork of possible ET encounters. At least I can remember one picture from that book where the ET or ET ship resembled the Monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey, which as I remember was floating in the air and wrapped in vines. This makes me contemplate even more now how ancient artists could depict such possible ET encounters for which SF, like Scaroth’s scroll picture in Dr. Who: City Of Death, can always make use of.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Arius says:

    The artist who knew too much ?
    Or perhaps we could rephrase that as the artist that knew things he could not possibly know … unless ?
    There are some subtle details that the artist has incorporated that does not stand up to the explanation you have described.
    There is a symbol on the leading craft. This is extremely significant. And opens a whole can of worms that leads down an extraordinary path.
    That symbol is very ancient, but hadn’t been seen in this form for nearly 3000 years. It is the Sumerian symbol for their gods “Those that from heaven to earth came”. This symbol eventually evolved into a crucifix. The symbol that the crucifix evolved from, the civilisation of the birthplace of Abram, was lost to the sands 3000 years ago, and was not uncovered until just over 100 years ago, in Iraq. This same symbol was engraved into the side of the craft encountered at Rendlesham Forest. It is also evident in the painting that the artist included some sort of control mechanism for the occupant.
    If all this holds any relevance, then the second following object depicted by the artist is the comet, or wandering star, spoken of in Sumerian writings. The home of their gods. “Those that from heaven to earth came”.
    I have also heard a theory that the symbol depicts a crater on the moon, in the same vein as your suggestion. However, no-one had seen a crater on the moon until the development of the telescope 300 years after this painting.
    Irrationally, the artist could have no knowledge of the things I have suggested … unless …. someone knew all the time ?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s